Style & Tailoring

Are Oliver Cabell Sneakers a Better Buy Than Common Projects?

Common Projects invented the luxury minimalist sneaker, but Oliver Cabell promises the exact same quality for half the price. We put both shoes to the test to find the ultimate winner.

By Arthur Pemberton31 Jul 20266 min read
Photo illustration for The Refined.
In this piece

In the early 2000s, if you wanted to wear sneakers, your options were essentially limited to chunky athletic running shoes or canvas Converse Chuck Taylors. There was no middle ground. You could not wear sneakers with a suit, and you certainly couldn’t wear them to a high-end restaurant.

Then, in 2004, a brand called Common Projects released a shoe called the Achilles Low.

The Achilles Low completely revolutionized the footwear industry. It was a sneaker stripped of all logos, branding, and unnecessary padding, crafted in Italy from premium calfskin leather, and stamped only with ten subtle gold numbers on the heel. It was the birth of the luxury minimalist sneaker.

For over a decade, Common Projects held an absolute monopoly on this aesthetic. But as their prices crept from $250 up to a staggering $450+, a wave of direct-to-consumer competitors emerged, promising the exact same Italian craftsmanship without the luxury markup.

The most prominent of these challengers is Oliver Cabell. Their flagship model, the Low 1, looks nearly identical to the Achilles Low but costs significantly less.

So, if you are in the market for a pristine white leather sneaker, which brand actually deserves your money? We bought both pairs, wore them for six months, and broke them down. Here is the definitive showdown between Common Projects and Oliver Cabell.

1. The Silhouette and Design

At first glance, the two shoes look identical. Both are minimalist, low-top, white leather sneakers sitting on a white Margom rubber sole. However, the devil is entirely in the details.

Common Projects: The Achilles Low

The silhouette of the Achilles Low is legendary for a reason. It is incredibly sleek. The toe box is famously elongated and narrow, mimicking the sleek profile of an Italian dress shoe. This is what allows the Achilles to pair so beautifully with tailored trousers and suits.

  • The Branding: The iconic gold serial number on the heel remains the only visible branding.

Oliver Cabell: The Low 1

The Low 1 is undeniably handsome, but it has a slightly different profile. The toe box is a bit rounder and slightly wider than the Achilles. It looks a tiny bit more like a traditional athletic sneaker (like an Adidas Stan Smith) than a dress shoe.

  • The Branding: Oliver Cabell uses a very subtle gold foil stamp of their logo on the heel, the tongue, and the insole. It is tasteful, but it is technically more branding than Common Projects.

Winner: Common Projects. The razor-sharp, elongated toe box of the Achilles Low is simply unmatched. It is the gold standard of the minimalist silhouette.

2. Leather Quality and Construction

Both brands claim to use full-grain calfskin leather sourced from the Marche region of Italy. Both shoes are hand-stitched and both use the legendary Margom rubber cup-sole.

Common Projects

The leather on a brand new pair of Common Projects is famously stiff. There is a notoriously brutal break-in period that can cause severe blistering for the first two weeks of wear. However, once the leather breaks in, it molds perfectly to your foot and ages beautifully. The stitching is absolutely flawless.

Oliver Cabell

When you pull the Low 1 out of the box, the leather feels immediately softer and more supple than the Achilles. Oliver Cabell uses a slightly different tanning process that prioritizes immediate comfort. You can wear them out of the box with zero blisters. However, over six months of testing, we found that the softer leather of the Oliver Cabell creased slightly faster and deeper across the toe box than the rigid leather of the Common Projects.

Winner: Tie. Oliver Cabell wins on immediate comfort, but Common Projects wins on long-term durability and crease resistance.

3. Comfort and Sizing

Both shoes are built on the same Margom sole, which is incredibly durable but notoriously hard and heavy. Neither of these shoes feels like walking on a cloud of modern athletic foam.

Common Projects Sizing

The Achilles Low runs very long and very narrow. If you have wide feet, this shoe will be a nightmare for you. Most men have to size down one full size (e.g., if you are a US 10, you buy an EU 42 instead of a 43) to accommodate the length, which makes the shoe even narrower.

Oliver Cabell Sizing

The Low 1 is built on a slightly more forgiving, wider last. It accommodates a standard foot much better than the Achilles. They also run a bit more true-to-size, though they do not offer half sizes. Furthermore, Oliver Cabell includes a slightly thicker, more cushioned insole out of the box, making them noticeably more comfortable for long days of walking.

Winner: Oliver Cabell. The wider toe box and the softer insole make the Low 1 a significantly more comfortable shoe for the average foot.

4. Price and Value Proposition

This is where the debate usually ends for most buyers.

  • Common Projects: The retail price for a pair of Achilles Lows is currently hovering around $450 to $495. They rarely go on sale, and when they do, the white colorway is almost never included.
  • Oliver Cabell: The retail price for the Low 1 is usually around $220 to $250.

Oliver Cabell provides complete transparency on their pricing model, openly sharing the cost of their leather, stitching, and shipping, arguing that Common Projects applies a massive “brand tax.”

Winner: Oliver Cabell. You are getting 95% of the quality of Common Projects for roughly half the price.

The Final Verdict

Are Oliver Cabell sneakers a better buy than Common Projects?

For 90% of men, the answer is a resounding yes. The Oliver Cabell Low 1 offers identical Italian materials, significantly better out-of-the-box comfort, a more forgiving fit for normal-to-wide feet, and a price tag that is $200 cheaper. It is arguably the best value proposition in the luxury sneaker market today.

You should only buy Common Projects if: You have very narrow feet, you absolutely demand the razor-sharp dress shoe silhouette of the Achilles, and you care deeply about the specific cultural cachet (and the gold numbers) associated with the original inventor of the luxury minimalist sneaker.

For everyone else, take the $200 you saved by buying Oliver Cabell and invest it in a great pair of raw denim jeans to wear with your new sneakers.

sneakersreviewsbrands
Read next

Return to front page →